Who is Sergey Kislyak, and how did he become the hottest meeting ticket in Washington?

His diplomatic career has encompassed the Cold War, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the inexorable-seeming rise of one Vladimir Putin. Now Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to the United States, finds himself in a harsh and unwanted spotlight over contacts with Donald Trump’s campaign team.

After nearly a decade as Moscow’s man in Washington, the portly, bespectacled envoy is a well-known commodity in diplomatic circles. Though said to prefer behind-the-scenes parley, he plays an occasional role as Russia’s public face at events such as policy forums and academic symposia across the United States.

Kislyak, 66, is also the Russian president’s eyes and ears — a role that likely took him last April to a front-row seat in a ballroom at Washington’s ornate Mayflower Hotel, where an upstart presidential aspirant named Donald Trump took to the lectern to deliver his first major foreign policy speech.

Trump’s speech gained him little traction with the invite-only crowd of foreign policy experts, some of whom made dismissive note of what they called a somewhat incoherent world view. In retrospect, the candidate’s address was perhaps most notable for what would become an increasingly prominent campaign theme in months to come: the need for better relations with Russia.

Kislyak is well acquainted with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which has been derided as obsolete by Trump, serving as Russia’s envoy to the alliance between 1998 and 2003. After a stint back in Moscow, Kislyak took up ambassadorial duties in Washington in 2008, making him an unusually long-serving diplomat in the prestigious posting of the U.S. capital.   

In public, Kislyak’s remarks generally conform to a traditionally Kremlin view — that Russia seeks common ground with the West, but often faces provocation instead.   

 “You tried to contain Russia through pressure, economic sanctions, propaganda,” he said at last November’s forum at Stanford. “From the Russian point of view, it’s not something we initiated —we had to respond.”

Times staff writer King reported from Washington and special correspondent Mirovalev from Moscow. Staff writer Ann M. Simmons in Los Angeles contributed to this report.


Twitter: @laurakingLAT


The definitive guide to Trump’s Russia ties


Here’s a rundown of what issues are at play. | POLITICO illustration / AP and iStock

President Donald Trump’s relationship with Russia is again dominating the headlines in the wake of confirmation that the FBI is actively investigating whether his campaign colluded with the Kremlin as it allegedly attempted to influence last November’s election.

FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on Monday prompted even Rep. Devin Nunes, a Republican and Trump ally on Capitol Hill, to observe that the investigation is a “big, gray cloud” hanging over the White House.

Story Continued Below

Aside from distracting from Trump’s legislative agenda, the testimony is sure to embolden lawmakers who are calling for an independent prosecutor to investigate claims that Trump’s campaign was in contact with Russia as it tried to tilt the election the president’s way.

The ongoing saga has many parts, but it centers around what relationship, if any, Trump’s campaign may have had with Russia. Here’s a rundown of what issues are at play.

What is the Trump-Russia scandal about?

Trump raised eyebrows throughout his campaign for his unusual praise of Vladimir Putin, the Russian president whom many lawmakers regard as an autocrat and an adversary of America.

The president’s critics are now wondering aloud whether his posture toward Putin is a sign of an inappropriate relationship between the two leaders, which Trump denies.

Specifically, as intelligence officials and congressional committees investigate the extent of Russia’s alleged attempts to meddle in the presidential election through cyberattacks on Democratic Party leaders, one major question is whether Trump’s campaign was in contact with Russian officials before Election Day.

The Trump campaign has denied any such contact, but The New York Times and CNN reported in February that U.S. intelligence officials had evidence of repeated contacts between some Trump campaign associates and Russian officials.

The White House has pushed back on those reports, but if true, they raise another question: Did Trump’s campaign have any knowledge of, or encourage, Russia’s alleged cyberattacks on Democrats during the campaign? (The Trump campaign has repeatedly denied any such wrongdoing.)

Attorney General Jeff Sessions invited fresh scrutiny into the Trump campaign’s conduct when The Washington Post broke the news that he had held two meetings with the Russian ambassador last year, appearing to contradict his previous testimony. Under pressure in early March, he recused himself from any investigations involving the 2016 presidential election.

When did the Russia controversy start?

Last summer, private Democratic National Committee emails stolen by hackers were published on the website WikiLeaks, embarrassing Hillary Clinton’s campaign. In the fall, hacked emails from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta also appeared on the site.

U.S. intelligence officials later concluded that the Russian government was behind the hacks, carried out with the specific goal of hurting Clinton and helping Trump as he sought the presidency. President Barack Obama ordered intelligence officials to compile a report on the suspected election meddling before he left office.

At first, Trump refused to accept the intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia was behind the hacks, but he eventually did.

The scrutiny heated up around Trump and his associates in February, when reports surfaced that Michael Flynn, then Trump’s national security adviser, had inappropriately discussed sanctions on Russia with the country’s ambassador before the inauguration and lied about it to the public and Vice President Mike Pence.

Flynn was forced to resign, but the questions did not stop there. At about the same time, The New York Times and CNN reports about the Trump campaign’s alleged contact with Russian officials came out, igniting a firestorm.

Who’s involved?

Citing anonymous intelligence officials, the Times report named Flynn, former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, onetime campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page and Trump confidant Roger Stone as the aides whose communications the FBI had probed for possible contacts with Russia.

The Times reported that the FBI found evidence that Manafort had been in contact with Russian officials. Manafort, who has done business in Ukraine, has denied this.

The newspaper noted that intelligence officials said they had not yet seen evidence that the aides had colluded with Russia on the suspected cyberattacks.

Sessions became a player in the saga when news broke that he had met with the Russian ambassador last year but not told a Senate committee about it during his confirmation hearing. The Wall Street Journal also reported that contacts between the attorney general and Russia had been “examined” by U.S. investigators, led by the FBI.

Sessions maintains that those contacts were not about the campaign and were in his capacity as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. And the White House dismissed the outcry to the report as attacks by “partisan Democrats.”

“I never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign,” Sessions said at the time, through a spokeswoman. “I have no idea what this allegation is about. It is false.”

But the news prompted more people, including House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz, to call for the attorney general to recuse himself from the ongoing investigation into Russia’s alleged attempts to meddle in the presidential election. Reportedly against Trump’s wishes, Sessions agreed and announced that he would stay out of any investigations related to the 2016 election.

Some Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, maintain that he should resign because the news contradicts his previous testimony, under oath, that he had no contacts with Russia as a campaign surrogate.

Who’s investigating Trump’s suspected Russia ties?

Intelligence and law enforcement officials have been probing the suspected attempts by Russia to meddle in the 2016 election. As part of its counterintelligence probe, the FBI is also looking into contacts between Trump campaign advisers and Russian officials in the lead-up to the election and whether they coordinated on the cyberattacks, as Comey confirmed when he testified before the House Intelligence Committee.

According to Comey, the FBI’s investigation has been ongoing since July, which he described as a “fairly short period of time” for a counterintelligence probe. He would not say, however, whether or not the bureau has found any evidence to suggest collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians. He also declined to comment on which Trump aides, if any, the FBI is scrutinizing.

The Senate and House intelligence committees also are in the midst of a bipartisan investigation into the broad question of Russia’s attempts to meddle in the election, including the allegations about the Trump campaign.

When Comey testified before the House committee about the FBI’s work on the subject, Nunes, the group’s chair and a Republican, urged him to complete the investigation quickly if possible.

“There’s a big gray cloud that you’ve now put over people who have very important work to do to lead this country, and so the faster that you can get to the bottom of this, it’s going to be better for all Americans,” Nunes said.

Some lawmakers, largely Democrats, have called for a bipartisan, 9/11-style outside commission to take on the case. Others, including the Republican Rep. Darrell Issa of California, have suggested that a special prosecutor should be appointed.

So far, no such person has been appointed, but Sessions has recused himself from investigating any cases related to the election.

What about that dossier?

In the background of this discussion is a series of explosive but unverified allegations about Trump and Russia detailed in a now-infamous “dossier.” The document, compiled by a former British intelligence official on behalf of Trump opponents during the campaign, purported to outline evidence that Trump has deep ties to Russia, along with crude allegations that remain unverified.

After CNN reported in January that intelligence officials had briefed Trump and then-President Obama on the existence of the document, BuzzFeed published it in its entirety. That decision prompted Trump to dismiss it as “fake news” and call the news outlet “a failing pile of garbage.”

CNN reported last month that U.S. investigators had been able to corroborate some of the communications outlined in the document, but nothing related to the “salacious allegations.”

What are the stakes?

Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook has compared the controversy to Watergate, but no “smoking guns” have emerged to suggest that Trump or his associates were in on Russia’s suspected attacks on the Democrats. Trump critics are warning, though, that it would be a scandal of historic proportions if that happened.

Even if no such evidence emerges, Democrats are sure to exploit the ongoing investigations, and the fallout from Flynn and Sessions’ misstatements, for political gain. Like other recent developments in the saga have, Comey’s testimony is distracting from Trump’s agenda, just as Congress looks to push through health care legislation and the president’s Supreme Court nominee.

The scandal could also affect major negotiations between the U.S. and Russia on issues such as Syria, the Islamic State, Ukraine, NATO and nuclear proliferation.

Further, there are still general questions about what Russia did to influence last year’s election and how the U.S. can protect itself from cyberattacks on the government and other democratic institutions, like the major political parties, going forward.


Red America and blue America saw two very different Trump speeches

Early in his speech to Congress, when President Trump likened his election to a political earthquake, it practically lifted Kristen Rossow off her couch.

Sitting in the family room of her split-level home in this tidy Boise suburb, watching with her husband and daughter — all Trump fans — she sprang up and raised two fists to the ceiling.

“Yes!” she exulted with a broad smile at the pinch-me moment. “This is seriously a miracle!”

In Las Vegas, Jose Venturi watched with arms crossed Tuesday night, sunk into his orange sofa, as if shielding himself from the words coming from his television set.

Far from raising alarms, the more his opponents attacked him and the media piled on, the better Trump looked.

“When people called him a bigot and a racist, he said, ‘I don’t care, I’ll say what I believe based on principle,’” Rossow said with admiration. “He was the only one with the courage to take on the media and the corruption in Washington.”


Trump lays out ambitious plans for healthcare and immigration in a disciplined speech to Congress

President Trump championed new approaches to healthcare and immigration Tuesday in a disciplined address to a joint session of Congress that may have been his most traditional political speech since he entered public life decades ago.

The outsider who has relished blunt and confrontational stage banter honed from talk radio delivered a speech that took aim at his long-promised goal: to be “more presidential than anybody.”

Trump softened some of the rougher edges of his nationalist ideology as a call for citizens to appeal to their better natures for a “renewal of the American spirit” and to leave “the trivial fights behind us.” He told the inspirational story of a child who survived a near-fatal disease and mourned with a widow who lost her husband to a botched military operation. And he sought to emphasize some of his proposals that may draw bipartisan support, such as lower-priced prescription drugs and paid family leave, prompting a rare ovation from Democrats in the room.

“Everything that is broken in our country can be fixed,” he said. “Every problem can be solved. And every hurting family can find healing, and hope.”

Trump also failed to mention the so-called Dreamers, the young people temporarily shielded from deportation under an immigration program created by President Obama. Trump vowed during the campaign to end protections for them but has publicly wavered several times, and his administration continues to issue work permits to those who apply and qualify for the program.

Trump opened his address with his most expansive condemnation to date of acts of violence and vandalism motivated by religious and racial bigotry.  

“We may be a nation divided on policies; we are a country that stands united in condemning hate and evil in all its forms,” he said, denouncing the spate of bomb threats to Jewish community centers and a shooting of two Indian men last week in Kansas.

The most powerful moment came when Trump acknowledged Carryn Owens, the widow of Navy Chief Special Warfare Operator William “Ryan” Owens, who was killed Jan. 29 during a raid on a compound in Yemen used by Al Qaeda’s affiliate there.

William Owens, the Navy SEAL’s father, called for an investigation into the raid this week. The military has acknowledged that Yemeni civilians, including women and children, were also killed, along with 14 militants. 

Congress gave a standing ovation as Carryn Owens looked up, tears in her eyes, her hands folded. The applause lasted for more than a minute — the longest of the night. 

Democrats said the speech’s upbeat tone did not match Trump’s true agenda, or his performance so far.

Former Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear, chosen to deliver the party’s response, said Trump’s early actions showed he was “Wall Street’s champion,” before turning to defend Obama’s healthcare overhaul that he said had been a revelation to his conservative-leaning state.

“Mr. President, folks here in Kentucky expect you to keep your word. Because this isn’t a game – it’s life and death for people,” he said.

Staff writers W.J. Hennigan, David Lauter and Sarah D. Wire contributed to this report.

noah.bierman@latimes.com | Twitter: @noahbierman

michael.memoli@latimes.com | Twitter: @mikememoli

brian.bennett@latimes.com | Twitter: @bybrianbennett


Grade the president: Here’s how you think Trump is doing so far

Trump’s popularity at CPAC gathering, which he shunned a year ago, shows how he’s conquered conservatives

Trump said he would isolate his family businesses, but they have already seeped into the White House


9:15 p.m.: This story was updated with more details from Trump’s address.

8:30 p.m.: This story was updated with more comments from Trump and the Democratic response.

7:30 p.m.: This story was updated with more comments from Trump.

6:15 p.m.: This story was updated with the start of Trump’s speech and prepared excerpts.

This story was originally published at 3:35 p.m.