Member of Senate GOP leadership says Trump tweets are racist

Senate Republican Conference Vice Chairwoman Joni ErnstJoni Kay ErnstAcosta on shaky ground as GOP support wavers The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden looks to rebound after tough week Democratic Senate hopes hinge on Trump tide MORE (R-Iowa) said Monday that she thinks President TrumpDonald John TrumpCNN’s Camerota clashes with Trump’s immigration head over president’s tweet LA Times editorial board labels Trump ‘Bigot-in-Chief’ Trump complains of ‘fake polls’ after surveys show him trailing multiple Democratic candidates MORE’s tweets suggesting that minority Democratic lawmakers “go back” to the countries they came from was racist.


Ernst was pressed by reporters about Trump’s tweets from the weekend when she walked into a weekly leadership meeting in Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellWhat Democrats should say about guns This week: House Dems voting to hold Barr, Ross in contempt Juan Williams: GOP in a panic over Mueller MORE’s (R-Ky.) office.

Asked if she thought Trump’s comments were specifically racist, Ernst acknowledged, “Yeah, I do.”  

She reiterated that view when asked on another occasion by a CNN reporter if she found Trump’s comments racist.

“Uh, yeah. They’re American citizens,” she said, referring to Trump’s suggestion that Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-CortezAlexandria Ocasio-CortezHillary Clinton responds to Trump tweets telling Dem lawmakers to ‘go back’ to their countries Trump doubles down after telling Democratic congresswomen to ‘go back’ to their countries #RacistInChief takes off on Twitter after Trump tells Dems to go back where they ‘came from’ MORE (N.Y.), Ilhan OmarIlhan OmarLA Times editorial board labels Trump ‘Bigot-in-Chief’ NYT’s Friedman repeatedly says ‘s—hole’ in tirade against Trump on CNN Foreign-born lawmaker: Trump’s not going to tell me to ‘go back to my country’ MORE (Minn.), Rashida TlaibRashida Harbi TlaibKasich calls on Republicans to condemn ‘deplorable’ Trump tweets LA Times editorial board labels Trump ‘Bigot-in-Chief’ NYT’s Friedman repeatedly says ‘s—hole’ in tirade against Trump on CNN MORE (Mich.) and Ayanna PressleyAyanna PressleyKasich calls on Republicans to condemn ‘deplorable’ Trump tweets LA Times editorial board labels Trump ‘Bigot-in-Chief’ NYT’s Friedman repeatedly says ‘s—hole’ in tirade against Trump on CNN MORE (Mass.), who all identify as racial minorities, go back to the counties they’re from.

Of that group, only Omar, a native of Somalia, was born outside the United States.  

Ernst also called the comments “not constructive” and “not helpful.”

Like other Republicans, she said Trump should focus on policies instead of personal attacks.

“Let’s focus on policies and we can debate those policies because I personally think the GOP has a stronger platform to talk about. That’s what we should be focusing on,” she said.

Ernst, a first-term member of the Senate, is up for reelection next year and Democrats think they have a shot of defeating her if Trump underperforms expectations.

She has distanced herself from Trump on other occasions, such as earlier this year when she warned Trump not to trust North Korean leader Kim Jong UnKim Jong UnA brief timeline of Trump’s clashes with intelligence director Dan Coats Stephen King says Trump’s presidency is ‘scarier’ than his novels Trump boasts that Kim Jong Un ‘was so happy to see me’ MORE or when she has criticized his tariff policy.

Ernst said Monday that she had not spoken to Trump about his tweets.

How Trump aides rushed to repackage the ‘go back’ tweets

 Donald Trump

President Donald Trump’s outbursts put him at risk of alienating independent voters and those in battleground states. | Richard Drew/AP Photo

White House

Over the course of 24 hours, the Trump campaign tried to repackage the attack as a broader patriotic message.

Within hours of President Donald Trump’s radioactive tweets on Sunday urging several minority Democratic congresswomen to “go back” to other countries, his campaign was scrambling to repackage the attack into a broader patriotic message.

By Sunday night, the campaign was portraying Trump as a defender of American pride. “President Trump loves this country [and] doesn’t like it when elected officials constantly disparage it,” said Tim Murtaugh, communications director for Trump’s reelection operation.

Story Continued Below

By Monday morning, the campaign’s rapid response director and Trump himself were branding the congresswomen as dangerous ideologues, retweeting Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham’s accusations that the congresswomen were “a bunch of communists.”

By Monday afternoon, Trump was clinging to a list of talking points about his initial comments as he discussed them at the White House, laying out the mutated framing that had developed among his campaign and closest allies over the last 24 hours — Democrats have become infested by socialists who detest America.

“My point was if you are not happy here, you can leave,” read one bullet point.

“They want America to be SOCIALIST,” read another.

The evolution from the Sunday tweets to the Monday talking points offers a glimpse of what the Trump campaign will likely have to deal with as it heads into the heart of the 2020 election. While Trump’s reelection officials have long insisted that the best strategy is to always follow the president’s political instincts, the last few days have shown they will also have to regularly find ways to map Trump’s outbursts onto the campaign themes they think will drive him to victory.

Indeed, numerous campaign officials and White House allies were disappointed with Trump’s Sunday Twitter attack on four progressive congresswomen — Reps. Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Trump wrote that the group should return to “crime infested places from which they came,” even though three of the four were born in America and all four are American citizens. Additionally, none of the lawmakers are socialist.

Other comments the president has made — first as a candidate and then while in office — have been equally jaw-dropping and attracted comparable amounts of negative coverage, but the timing of his latest tirade was more damaging than most.

Several advisers and allies expressed concern that the president was undoing months of campaign work to frame the upcoming election as a choice between an America-loving, pro-capitalist president, and a Democratic Party beholden to fringe socialists who hate America and despise capitalism. The comments also had the ancillary effect of uniting a fractious Democratic caucus that had spent the week engaged in intraparty squabbling between party leaders and the progressive members that Trump was going after.

“I’m disappointed he injected himself [in] Dem on Dem violence,” said a Republican who speaks with Trump regularly. “Anything the president does that distracts from the larger and broader issue is always a gift” for Democrats.

Sunday marked the first time an unexpected presidential tweet had sent the Trump campaign into damage control since the president officially launched his reelection bid in Orlando, Fla., last month. One former White House official said the episode should serve as a preview for new campaign officials as they prepare to enter a grueling election cycle.

“Right now, you’ve got a group of people who are relatively new to Trump world who are still of the mind that they can endure stuff like this. The only way to preserve your sanity is to understand that wave after wave of people have tried to get [Trump] to do certain things and so you either sign up for who he is or get out while you can,” the former official said.

Even if Trump’s current team can salvage his controversial outbursts by spinning them to fit his campaign message, the president still runs the risk of alienating independent and battleground state voters with the initial remarks.

The president has rarely found broad support when voters are polled on his use of Twitter. In a recent POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, 70 percent of respondents said Trump uses the social media platform more than he should. Another 46 percent of voters said his Twitter use harms his shot at reelection.

Publicly, Trump’s allies argue that the president’s tweets helps him evade media spin. Trump employs Twitter “to speak directly to the American people without the filter of corporate media and poll-tested talking points,” said Kelly Sadler, spokeswoman for the pro-Trump super PAC America First Action, in a text to POLITICO.

And his latest remarks, she argued, merely highlighted how “The socialist wing of the Democratic party routinely criticizes America,” she said, adding, “the toxic attitudes and policies these socialists are promoting are dangerous and will be rejected by voters.”

There’s also evidence that moments in Trump’s presidency when he’s been accused of making racist statements have done the most harm to his image. When Trump claimed there were “very fine people on both sides” after white supremacists clashed with counterprotesters in Charlottesville, Va., killing one woman and leaving others injured, his approval rating dipped to a low of 39 percent. And after word leaked out of the White House that Trump once referred to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as “shithole” countries, his rating fell to 36 percent.

Despite the corresponding slumps in his approval rating, Trump advisers still struggle to convince the president his line-crossing comments will damage his reelection prospects. Part of the problem, according to the former White House official, is that the president often develops a skewed perception of his support among minority voters.

“There’s a certain feedback loop that’s been established of how things are going that may or may not be reality. So if he’s watching Fox News all day and gets a certain view of the world, and you combine that with objectively strong economic numbers, you can see why a guy like Trump could convince himself that he’s doing well with minority voters,” the former official said.

A few Republican lawmakers joined the choir condemning the president’s attacks against their progressive colleagues in Congress — something that further emboldens Trump, according to one campaign adviser.

“He says these things because he knows he can get away with them,” the adviser said. “No one wants to challenge him because they will end up irrelevant if they do.”

GOP senator: ‘Outrageous’ to say Trump’s tweets about Democratic congresswomen are racist

Trump doubled down on his comments Monday during an event at the White House, denying that he was being racist and expressing no remorse when told that white nationalist groups found common cause with his message.

“It doesn’t concern me because many people agree with me,” Trump told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House during an event designed to highlight American manufacturing.

Other Senate Republicans stopped short of calling Trump’s remarks racist. 

“Identify politics is a poison. It’s toxic. … The president shouldn’t have written that. I think it damages him. It damages the country,” he said. 

When a reporter noted that if another individual made comments similar to Trump’s they would be viewed as racist, Rubio added, “Most certainly I think people could take it that way, be offended by it.” 

“I …  actually, honestly, haven’t read anything except what you all have reported. But the reality is that I want to shift back onto the issues,” Tillis said. 

Pressed about whether he thought Trump’s tweets were racist, Tillis added, “I literally don’t go on Twitter.”

Donald Trump Is Who We Thought He Was

Donald Trump

Alex Brandon/AP Photo

fourth estate

Now everyone’s getting smeared in the argument over his racist tweets. That doesn’t mean his critics should stand down.

Jack Shafer is Politico’s senior media writer.

President Donald Trump blew the lid off hell on Sunday when he tweeted that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts—four progressive Democratic congresswomen who are among his biggest critics—should “go back” to the “broken and crime infested places from which they came.” Trump’s racist comments attracted sharp—and deeply deserved—reproofs from Democrats and the press.

But let’s not kid ourselves. Nobody was surprised. Trump didn’t give us any new data on who he is, only additional confirmation of the ancient data on who he is. We have every right to be shocked and amazed at what he said but not that he said it. Racist conduct has been a constant in his life as a recent Atlantic piece attests. It starts with the Trump family’s discriminatory rental practices throughout the 1970s and extends to his public campaign against the Central Park Five and continues through the “birther” claim he used against President Barack Obama. He sympathized with the neo-Nazis and white supremacists in Charlottesville, Virginia, said a judge could not hear a civil case against him because he was a Mexican American, and recently asked why the United States couldn’t attract more immigrants from Norway and fewer from “shithole” countries.

Story Continued Below

If Trump were a stock traded on Wall Street, you would say that racism is fully discounted into his price. Asking Trump to abandon his racism is like asking Ford to stop building cars. It’s integral to his psyche. Asking him to apologize won’t work, either. He never apologizes because he thinks it makes him look weak. And criticizing Trump will only accelerate him in the direction he was already headed, as he showed Monday at a White House event.

“These are people who in my opinion hate our country,” Trump said of the four progressives. “All I’m saying is, if they’re not happy here, they can leave. There will be many people who will be happy.” The people who should be apologizing, Trump insisted, were the progressive members of Congress who used “foul language” and said “terrible things.” He also turned the tables on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who said Trump’s true motive was to “make America white again.” Bursting with umbrage, Trump said, “That’s a very racist statement, I’m surprised she’d say that.”

Trump welcomed the criticism he received from Democrats for his comments because he can use them to paint Pelosi and the rest of the party in the progressive hues of the Ocasio-Cortez faction. But that trick doesn’t work when the criticism comes from his own party, which arrived on Monday as journalists polled Republican leaders for their views on the kerfuffle. Several members of Congress, including Senators Pat Toomey, Tim Scott, Lisa Murkowski and Mitt Romney, and Congressmen Fred Upton, Will Hurd and Mike Turner, criticized Trump in unambiguous term, calling his comments “wrong,” “racially offensive,” “way over the line,” “spiteful,” “really uncalled for,” “racist and xenophobic,” “demeaning,” and “racist.” That was a good start! Predictably, Senator Lindsey Graham hedged, offering a squishy defense of the progressives’ right to dissent but surely earning the president’s approval by calling them “a bunch of communists.”

But Republicans shouting “racism” probably won’t move the president much, either. During the 2016 campaign, Paul Ryan, the Republican House Speaker, called Trump’s comments about the Mexican America judge “the textbook definition of a racist comment,” and that rolled right off Trump’s back.

So what are Trump’s bipartisan critics to do? Just because words seem to have such a small effect on him doesn’t mean they should go silent. If we allow Trump to spout his racist views uncontested, the impressionable would have reason to read that as a tacit endorsement of the president’s views, leading some of them to echo and imitate the president. It might seem like a slog to engage Trump in the trench warfare of words that he’s arranged in which he calls everybody a racist who calls him a racist, but that’s the unfortunate price of doing politics these days.

Nobody is ever going to stop Trump from talking like Trump, but the failure of his critics to police his ugly talk doesn’t render the nation powerless in his wake. Trump, who fancies himself a winner, continues to lose in the courts, and since the midterms the Democratic House of Representatives has blocked him from using Congress as a rubber stamp. Like most loudmouths, his bark is his bite.

Meanwhile, if you hear something racist from Trump, say something.


Bark at me via email: My email alerts are spiteful, my Twitter feed is really uncalled for, and my RSS feed is way over the line.